Unfortunate Covers (#18)
When a good book is wrapped in a less-than-good jacket, we like to call that an Unfortunate Cover. I was walking by the fiction section in my 3rd and 4th grade school today when I saw this:

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Indian in the Cupboard by Lynn Reid Banks
*Shoe heels screeching to a halt*
*Double take*
This is what I like to call “severely dated”. Side note – this might sound odd, but doesn’t it seem like kids on the covers of books published in the 70s and 80s wore a lot of sweaters?
While most libraries have a more modern cover, I’m guessing there’s still a few sporting this early model.
Check out previous Unfortunate Covers:
#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17.
Join 2,000+ librarians! Subscribe to my newsletter on Substack
Filed under: Covers, Unfortunate Covers
About Travis Jonker
Travis Jonker is an elementary school librarian in Michigan. He writes reviews (and the occasional article or two) for School Library Journal and is a member of the 2014 Caldecott committee. You can email Travis at scopenotes@gmail.com, or follow him on Twitter: @100scopenotes.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SLJ Blog Network
Dog Lovers Alert! It’s a Things I Learned From My Dog Q&A with Victor Santos and Dena Seiferling
Crescent Moon Marching, Vol. 1 | Review
Early May Update: Our list of possible Newbery contenders according to Heavy Medal readers
From Policy Ask to Public Voice: Five Layers of Writing to Advance School Library Policy
Fast Five Interview: K. A. Cobell
ADVERTISEMENT


I weeded our copy with that cover a few months ago. There’s something vaguely menacing about it.
It is indeed an odd one in the current day and age. Aside from the sweater thing, it also seems like there was a lot of resting the head in the hand going on in 80s covers.
She came into our book store to sign (more than a dozen years ago, this would have been) and railed against most of the cover choices. Especially the one for One More River which I think still uses one of the two bad covers she showed us. It wasn’t just the bad art but apparently many inaccuracies as well. Fun times.
Thanks for the insider info, Jim. I could see the inaccurate cover issue getting the author steamed.