SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
SLJ Blog Network +
  • 100 Scope Notes
  • A Fuse #8 Production
  • Good Comics for Kids
  • Heavy Medal: A Mock Newbery Blog
  • Teen Librarian Toolbox
  • The Classroom Bookshelf
  • The Yarn
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About/Contact
  • *Best New Books*
    • Annual Best Lists
  • Reviews
    • One Star Review
    • Nonfiction
    • Toon Reviews
  • Articles
    • Authors
    • Link Du Jour
  • Covers
    • Covering the Newbery
    • Cover Curiosity
    • Unfortunate Covers
  • News
    • Books on Film
    • Morning Notes
  • Newsletter

May 6, 2016 by Travis Jonker

Lifting the Cone of Silence? The ALSC Awards and Confidentiality

May 6, 2016 by Travis Jonker   19 comments

Get_Smart-Cone-of-silence

Did you read this post over at the ALSC Blog yesterday?

SCROLL TO KEEP READING THIS POST

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Screenshot

While I’ve witnessed (and sometimes been a part of) “Should award discussions be secret forever?” conversations over the years, I didn’t expect ALSC Board to gather opinions on the matter.

I know when you have a blog you’re supposed to have really strong feelings about stuff and never consider anyone who disagrees with you (ha), but I’m struggling with this one. Hard. Should details about Caldecott/Newbery/Etc. be secret forever or not? (Side Note: ALSC has toyed with making parts of the process public in the past: you can read about it in this Collecting Children’s Books post – go to the section called The Newbery, Back in the Day)

One one hand, it would be fascinating to know the details of how a book ends up an award winner – you know, the other books that were in consideration, how the voting went – that kind of thing.

One the other hand, it could potentially turn the awards into something else. I had a recent conversation with a librarian friend who mentioned that if all the books nominated were made public, it would in essence turn the awards into Notables (an ALSC committee that is completely transparent and awards many books in any given year), and that it’s better to keep the Newbery et al. as something clearly separate.

Part of me says we’re living in an age of transparency, and the secrecy model is outdated.

Another part says screw it: keep the mystery alive.

What do you say?

Image Credit: http://i1.wp.com/www.istartedsomething.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/blog-cone-of-silence.jpg?, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47622033

Filed under: Articles

SHARE:

Read or Leave Comments

About Travis Jonker

Travis Jonker is an elementary school librarian in Michigan. He writes reviews (and the occasional article or two) for School Library Journal and is a member of the 2014 Caldecott committee. You can email Travis at scopenotes@gmail.com, or follow him on Twitter: @100scopenotes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

January 2023

Your 2023 Caldecott Comment Card

by Travis Jonker

January 2023

Who's Published the Most Newbery Winners in the Last 25 Years?

by Travis Jonker

January 2023

2023 Caldecott Medal Predictions

by Travis Jonker

January 2023

The Ten Most Eye-Opening Caldecott Books of All Time

by Travis Jonker

January 2023

Enter the World of Incredibly Specific Children's Literature Instagram Accounts

by Travis Jonker

ADVERTISEMENT

SLJ Blog Network

100 Scope Notes

Your 2023 Caldecott Comment Card

by Travis Jonker

A Fuse #8 Production

Poems As Picture Books: Zetta Elliott Discusses the Upcoming A Song for Juneteenth

by Betsy Bird

Good Comics for Kids

Evil Secret Society of Cats | This Week’s Comics

by Lori Henderson

Heavy Medal

FREEWATER wins the Newbery Medal, live reactions from Heavy Medal bloggers

by Emily Mroczek-Bayci

Teen Librarian Toolbox

A Conversation with Kendare Blake about BUFFY, THE NEXT GENERATION

by Amanda MacGregor

The Classroom Bookshelf

The Classroom Bookshelf is Moving

by Erika Thulin Dawes

The Yarn

A Book 25 Years in the Making: Marla Frazee Visits The Yarn

by Travis Jonker

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles on SLJ

6 Chapter Books Series Updates for Transitioning Readers

6 Middle Grade & YA Novels on Repeat for Groundhog Day

Supernatural Page-Turners for 'Lockwood & Co.' Fans | Read-Alikes

ChatGPT Does Readers’ Advisory | Top Stories on SLJ

Remember: 10 Titles to Read for Holocaust Remembrance Day

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dan Santat says

    May 6, 2016 at 11:58 am

    I for one think this is a bad idea. Coming from a creators point of view it would just lead to thoughts of “what could have been” and “how could I have made it better.” On another note, we already see that publishers hear rumors of why books may or may not have been taken off the table for an award (art in the gutter, etc.) and it suddenly screams as gospel for what not to do in a book. This could possibly lead to being restrictive in the book making process.

    • Travis Jonker says

      May 6, 2016 at 12:07 pm

      It’s nice to get your perspective on this, Dan. I hadn’t considered how it might look from the book creator side of things.

      • Dan Santat says

        May 6, 2016 at 12:40 pm

        I was also told from a former Caldecott judge that years ago they used to show the point spread between the Medalists and Honor books. When you dictate which book was the first honor, second honor, and so forth it devalues the ones with fewer votes when they should be equally admired.

        • Travis Jonker says

          May 6, 2016 at 1:45 pm

          I hear you on that – I appreciate the fact that honors are held in equal esteem as “also truly distinguished”.

  2. Tracey Elrod says

    May 6, 2016 at 12:00 pm

    I started to take the survey and realized….I’m not sure how I feel about this! I think there are only a few true surprises in life and for me, the YMA announcements are one of them. Especially this year with LSOMS winning the Newbery! For mock groups, keeping the secrets also gives students a chance to nominate and read their favorites with their peers without worrying what the “grown-ups” consider to be their favorites. Hmmmm….I guess I have formed an opinion after all!

    • Travis Jonker says

      May 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      Ha! I had the exact same experience – I started the survey then froze.

  3. Matthew Cordell says

    May 6, 2016 at 1:53 pm

    I also lean toward the side of “just keep it a secret.” I heard a rumor once (hey, we’ll always have the rumors!) that a book that won the Caldecott was actually not the favorite of the committee, but everyone gave it a medium score which ultimately tallied it up to the top. (Crazy Caldecott stuff that I’ll never understand!) If, in fact, this is not a rumor and that this could actually happen (again, I don’t understand it, probably never will), these sort of details would take away from the award and the recipient.

    • Travis Jonker says

      May 6, 2016 at 2:15 pm

      Thanks for adding your comment, Mr. Cordell. What you’re saying – knowing the details could potentially take away from the award – makes a lot of sense. I’m curious to know how the ALSC survey I liked to turns out.

      Side note on the voting stuff you mentioned: There’s definitely a process of consensus building (at least in my experience) – I could see a case where a book that was not widely thought of as “the one” rises to the top as rounds of voting occur. At the end of the day, a book must get at least 8 “first choice” votes and be ahead of the pack by at least 8 points to win the medal (for Caldecott).

  4. Matt Tavares says

    May 6, 2016 at 2:31 pm

    There is something magical about those gold and silver stickers, and I think the secrecy is a big part of it.

  5. Beth says

    May 6, 2016 at 2:54 pm

    I felt like it would be interesting from a historical perspective to see a list of nominated books, but I support the 25 years after timeframe. Enough time that most of the people involved will not be too emotionally invested.

  6. Rosemary says

    May 7, 2016 at 9:51 am

    As a former bookseller it was always frustrating that we had no idea who was nominated for the award. It makes it so difficult to sell a book that is not readily available. Since the winners and honors are a “surprise” the publishers often do not have enough stock to go around. This I feel is a disservice to the authors who won. They lost sales because by the time the books are back in print some had lost interest. Yes some would wait but the initial thrill of buying the “winner” would definitely wane. I don’t advocate knowing the process for the decision but a shortlist similar to the National Book Award might not be a bad idea.

  7. Ed Spicer says

    May 9, 2016 at 7:25 am

    As a member of three single book selection committees, I think after ten years just spill it! I think it could be a huge help to current committee members to see the guts of the process. It would also be fascinating to see what else TEN YEARS ago was close. It could even bring some of those great books back into print.

  8. Eric Carpenter says

    May 9, 2016 at 8:30 am

    I think a decision like this would come down to a couple of factors.
    Would a lifting of confidentiality significantly contribute to the furthering of these awards’ intended purpose?
    Let’s look at the newbery for example.
    For the Newbery we’d have to go back to Frederic G.Melcher intention and then determine what if anything lifting the confidentiality would do to help or hinder these intentions.
    From the ALSC website:
    The purpose of the Newbery Medal was stated as follows: “To encourage original creative work in the field of books for children. To emphasize to the public that contributions to the literature for children deserve similar recognition to poetry, plays, or novels. To give those librarians, who make it their life work to serve children’s reading interests, an opportunity to encourage good writing in this field.”
    Does secrecy contribute to or diminish the ability of this award to fulfil its purpose?

    Whatever is decided, I hope nothing is done retroactively. A committee member 10, 25, or even 50 years ago deserves the right to have his or her votes and opinions kept confidential if he or she believed that those votes and opinions were to be forever confidential.

    • Linda Ward-Callaghan says

      May 9, 2016 at 8:37 pm

      I agree with Eric. If transparency is needed, it should start with committees in the future so the members know that their discussion is being taped; their suggestions and/or nominations are being tallied.

    • Ed Spicer says

      May 10, 2016 at 7:51 am

      Eric,

      Let’s assume that a new policy goes into place that is, as you suggest, not retroactive. Committee deliberations will become public after X amount of time. When this policy goes into effect, what would you think of past committee members like me, sharing their own personal committee experiences (without violating the privacy of other members), assuming that the X amount of time has elapsed? I can think of several books that could be helped by such revelations and several authors and illustrators that would be given an emotional boost by these narratives.

      • Eric Carpenter says

        May 10, 2016 at 9:49 am

        That I like! (Assuming committee members spoke of their experience and choices and not the ideas or opinions of their fellow committee members) I would love for past committee members to recount their own experiences to the public. I would be less thrilled to have those sealed boxes of ballots and committee notes that I assume are piled up in some dark corner of the ALSC office to be unsealed and shared with the public.
        In our ever more connected world where librarians and teachers interact with authors and publishers more and more, librarians who might have spoken ill of a particular book might one day find themselves in an awkward situation if they needed to work with that book’s author or publisher. Committee members deserve the right to say whatever they feel about a book without pulling their punches because their negative opinion might, in the future, prevent that committee member from hosting that author in their library.

  9. Ed Spicer says

    May 11, 2016 at 7:42 am

    Wouldn’t making the time period 50 years (or 75) take care of that?

  10. Chris says

    May 11, 2016 at 8:52 am

    I belong to the camp that believes that past confidentiality agreements should be respected. Committee members of the past were told their meetings would be private and that should be upheld. If this indeed changes then a clause should be added for future committee members to consider when accepting a selection committee position; a clause saying that in 25 or 50 years various aspects of the meeting can be accessed. I feel concerned though that a certain degree of self-consciousness will enter the discussions though. The conversations should be as free and open as possible.

  11. Jen says

    May 16, 2016 at 12:17 pm

    While I did not serve on the Newbery or Caldecott committees, I did serve on my state’s award committee. My opinion is if you were told your discussions and the books would be kept secret, then it should be kept secret. We felt free to speak candidly about books because it was confidential. If I knew someone would have access to our discussions, I might watch what I say. And as Dan said, knowing why things were not chosen may cause some of the creativity to be stifled so as to conform to some idea of what an award winner should be. This would not be good. As someone else mentioned, I like the mystery.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

  • Author/Illustrator Blogs

    • Erin Stead Illustration
    • Hey, Rabbit!
    • James Preller's Blog
    • MATTHEWCORDELLBLOGS
    • Mo Willems Doodles
    • The Scop
  • Book Blogs I Like

    • A Book and a Hug
    • A Fuse #8 Production
    • A Kids Book a Day
    • A Year of Reading
    • Abby (the) Librarian
    • Awful Library Books
    • Becky’s Book Reviews
    • Better Book Titles
    • Book-A-Day Almanac
    • Bookends
    • books4yourkids.com
    • bookshelves of doom
    • Bottom Shelf Books
    • Calling Caldecott
    • Caustic Cover Critic
    • Chad C. Beckerman
    • Charlotte’s Library
    • Cheryl Rainfield
    • Chicken Spaghetti
    • CHILDREN’S ILLUSTRATION
    • Collecting Children’s Books
    • Cybils
    • EarlyWord
    • educating alice
    • Finding Wonderland
    • For Those About to Mock
    • Good Comics for Kids
    • Good Show Sir
    • GottaBook
    • Great Kid Books
    • Heavy Medal: A Mock Newbery Blog
    • Hi Miss Julie!
    • Jen Robinson’s Book Page
    • Kidsmomo
    • Maria T. Middleton Design
    • Nerdy Book Club
    • Neverending Search
    • Nine Kinds of Pie
    • One Book, Two Books, Old Books, New Books
    • Out of the Box
    • Oz and Ends
    • PlanetEsme
    • Read Roger
    • Reading Rants!
    • Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast
    • sharpread
    • ShelfTalker
    • so tomorrow
    • The Children's Book Review
    • The Miss Rumphius Effect
    • Uncovered Cover Art
    • Waking Brain Cells
    • Watch. Connect. Read.
  • Library Blogs

    • ALSC Blog
    • Blue Skunk Blog
    • librarian.net
    • LISNews
    • Stephen's Lighthouse
    • Tame The Web: Libraries and Technology
    • Tame The Web: Libraries and Technology
    • Unshelved
  • Follow This Blog

    Enter your email address below to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    Primary Sidebar

    • News & Features
    • Reviews+
    • Technology
    • School Libraries
    • Public Libraries
    • Age Level
    • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Classroom
    • Diversity
    • People
    • Job Zone

    Reviews+

    • Book Lists
    • Best Books
    • Media
    • Reference
    • Series Made Simple
    • Tech
    • Review for SLJ
    • Review Submissions

    SLJ Blog Network

    • 100 Scope Notes
    • A Fuse #8 Production
    • Good Comics for Kids
    • Heavy Medal
    • Neverending Search
    • Teen Librarian Toolbox
    • The Classroom Bookshelf
    • The Yarn

    Resources

    • 2022 Youth Media Awards
    • The Newbery at 100: SLJ Celebrates the 100th Anniversary of the Award
    • Special Report | School Libraries 2021
    • Summer Reading 2021
    • Series Made Simple Spring 2021
    • SLJ Diverse Books Survey
    • Summer Programming Survey
    • Research
    • White Papers / Case Studies
    • School Librarian of the Year
    • Mathical Book Prize Collection Development Awards
    • Librarian/Teacher Collaboration Award

    Events & PD

    • In-Person Events
    • Online Courses
    • Virtual Events
    • Webcasts
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Media Inquiries
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • Content Submissions
    • Data Privacy
    • Terms of Use
    • Terms of Sale
    • FAQs
    • Diversity Policy
    • Careers at MSI


    COPYRIGHT © 2023


    COPYRIGHT © 2023