Photos: At the Dawn of Digital Illustration

I came across Daniel Pinkwater’s “The Muffin Fiend” today and I was taken aback. It wasn’t the story that did it, but the digital illustrations. Published in 1986, this is one of the earliest uses of computer-aided artwork I’ve seen in a children’s book.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Flipping through the book took me back to the time period in which it was made. Drawing on the computer was a new and exciting thing. It made me think of how nowadays, digital illustrations are common and it is often hard to tell them apart from physical artwork.

I have a friend who says he likes rock music better than hip-hop in part because “it’s harder to play a chord than push a button.” I disagree with this view, but I imagine he would not be a fan of computer-aided artwork for the same reasons he likes rock music. He might argue that it’s harder to physically illustrate than to use a computer, and therefore more worthy of appreciation.

I say a good illustration is a good illustration no mater how you get there. What do you say? Digital illustration – good, bad, or somewhere in between?
Join 2,000+ librarians! Subscribe to my newsletter on Substack
Filed under: Articles
About Travis Jonker
Travis Jonker is an elementary school librarian in Michigan. He writes reviews (and the occasional article or two) for School Library Journal and is a member of the 2014 Caldecott committee. You can email Travis at scopenotes@gmail.com, or follow him on Twitter: @100scopenotes.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SLJ Blog Network
Fuse 8 n’ Kate: The Wedding Procession of the Rag Doll & the Broom Handle and Who Was In It by Carl Sandburg, ill. Harriet Pincus
Bug Ego, vol. 1 | Review
Early May Update: Our list of possible Newbery contenders according to Heavy Medal readers
From Policy Ask to Public Voice: Five Layers of Writing to Advance School Library Policy
Fast Five Interview: Joy McCullough
ADVERTISEMENT


