… Or Should They Be Called "Visual Books"?

Well pull up a chair! Slate Magazine has gone all children’s lit and published a visual history of picture book illustration. Here’s an excerpt:

“During the 18^th century and for much of the 19^th, there wasn’t a whole lot of American literature for children. And when children’s books did get published, they weren’t designed for pleasure. Books were for schooling or for teaching religious and moral lessons—with properly serious illustrations chaperoning the text. This somber mode continued through the Civil War. And then it went poof, dispelled by artists who became children’s illustrators by happenstance. By the end of the 19^th century, the art in kids’ books had become madcap and zany and irreverent.”

And a handy slide show to boot.